May 2017

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910 111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Custom Text

I am going to put up a temporary filter for Wickets discussion and planning.  It is really only until we find an alternative method of communication.  I really liked the idea of a Yahoo group.  I think that would be great.  Anyone who wants to be in on the planning stage, reply to this post and I will add you in.

Thanks folks, for your support.  Note:  You can still be in on the planning even if all you want to do is read.  I am not going to make people be more involved than they want to be - I know that a lot of folks are still burned out from the planning of PC.

--Phae

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] victrola58.livejournal.com
put me in filter please? It sounds cool to me!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 02:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thtrelady.livejournal.com
I would love to help plan, but know that my style is to mostly lurk unless I really feel I have to say something. We need something to take TTs place, only without the drama.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 03:12 pm (UTC)
elf: Rainbow sparkly fairy (Default)
From: [personal profile] elf
Yahoogroups are... different from forums. Less cohesive, because not everyone uses the same method to reach them. (Some do email, some do daily archives, some do web access only.)

While they can have a strong sense of community (AmberandJet manages it, and so do witchesthree and witcheswithbrains, and no doubt several others I haven't seen), they do lack some features we've come to like in the forums--avatar/sig ability, profiles, different areas with archives that stay active.

And the only moderation ability is "force all of this person's posts to be approved by a mod before posting."

The message archives are either "all public" or "all private"--and I'm a lot more cautious about posting on public Yahoogroups than public forums, because they're a lot more tied into the search engines.

They do have the nifty file-hosting ability, and scheduling, and they come with chat. I've missed chat.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pjvj.livejournal.com
Beam me in, Scotty! (Please tell me the Star Trek reference is not lost on you.)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 05:19 pm (UTC)
elf: Rainbow sparkly fairy (Default)
From: [personal profile] elf
Oh good. Yes, that sounds wonderful.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 05:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sonicwylde.livejournal.com
I be willing to help with whatever :-) but just warn ya I do have a few papers to write still :-p

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estaratshirai.livejournal.com
In please.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jalilifer.livejournal.com
Not really interested in the planning (because I'm lazy, and because, well, because I hate "committee work"), but I'd love to come by once you get it up and running.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-28 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dbmyrrha.livejournal.com
I haven't found a forum worth spending any time on as of yet, but I'm willing to be open minded...count me in.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-04-29 01:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sanacrow.livejournal.com
UTWFC (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UTWFC/) is open for you to use. My honey's the owner, and is ready to help out as well.

It's currently set up so that anyone can join from the front page, but we can hide it and set it so that folks can only join by invite, or they need to be "approved" if that would work better for the planning stuff. (It would cut down on the ability of folks who have proven to be a problem to be a problem here/there.)

I think there are around 15 folks still on the list. I think you know most of them, and the couple that I *know* you don't know (Alta and Marvin) I can vouch for.